For decades, the taxi trade relied on a simple assumption: "If the police don't charge me, I keep my badge." In 2026, that assumption is dead. The National Minimum Standards have fundamentally shifted the burden of proof. Today, you do not need to be a criminal to lose your livelihood; you just need to be "on the balance of probab

  For decades, the taxi trade relied on a simple assumption: "If the police don't charge me, I keep my badge." In 2026, that assumption is dead. The National Minimum Standards have fundamentally shifted the burden of proof. Today, you do not need to be a criminal to lose your livelihood; you just need to be "on the balance of probab

  For decades, the standard British approach to dealing with the Home Office was one of polite deference. You filled out the forms, you paid your fees, and you waited patiently for a decision. Solicitors acted as administrators, checking boxes and ensuring the spelling was correct. But as we settle into the harsh reality of the 2026 immigrati

  In the hierarchy of motoring offences, driving without insurance (contrary to Section 143 of the Road Traffic Act 1988) occupies a unique and dangerous position. It is known in law as a "strict liability" offence. This means that your intent is irrelevant to the verdict. The court does not need to prove that you intended to d

  In the hierarchy of motoring offences, driving without insurance (contrary to Section 143 of the Road Traffic Act 1988) occupies a unique and dangerous position. It is known in law as a "strict liability" offence. This means that your intent is irrelevant to the verdict. The court does not need to prove that you intended to d